Lanny

Fast Charger Locations for Maryland ECGP, Round Two

October 18, 2022October 19, 2022 Lanny

The map above shows the locations of DC Fast Chargers planned by awardees of the Maryland ECGP Round Two.

Electric Corridors Grant Program – Round Two Awards

A year ago, Governor Larry Hogan announced the first of three rounds of funding for the Maryland Electric Corridors Grant Program (ECGP) funded by Maryland’s portion of the VW diesel settlement. The first round included 36 public DC fast chargers at 13 locations along designated Alternative Fuel Corridors. Many of these locations that were announced last year have yet to be built.

Round two includes 35 chargers at 13 additional locations.

Blink requested $1,684,189.50 in grant funding for 12 chargers at six Royal Farms stores plus an Exxon station in Grantsville in far Western Maryland. The six Royal Farms stores used to have 50 kW chargers on the ChargePoint network. Those have been shut off and each of the newly funded locations are approved to get two 180 kW Blink chargers.

An Exxon station in Big Pool, MD was approved for two 150 kW fast chargers. Big Pool Exxon requested $373,913.60 but it is not clear if they were approved for the entire amount. The grant has a cost share component so the recipients are required to pay a percentage of the total cost.

EVgo asked for $895,000.00 in Round 2 funding to place 19 fast chargers at 5 locations. One of those locations, the Wawa in Beltsville, seems to have already been built.

Maryland ECGP – VW Settlement

The funding comes from the Volkswagen diesel settlement. Maryland was allocated approximately $75.6 million to use on projects to reduce the effect of diesel emissions. Up to 15% ($11.3 million) of Maryland’s Volkswagen Mitigation Plan funding can be used for EV charging infrastructure.

Maryland decided to release the funding in three rounds of public-private partnership grants. The first round included $3.7 million for DC fast chargers and Level 2 workplace charging.

Maryland Alternative Fuel Corridors

The Maryland Electric Corridors Grant Program is for fast charging stations along Alternative Fuel Corridors that have been designated by the Federal Highway Administration. The Alternative Fuel Corridors for electric vehicles include US Routes 50 and 301 on the Eastern Shore and I-68 / I-70 in Western Maryland.

Funding Award Chart

The chart below details the applicants’ locations, number of chargers and funding amounts.

I Tested Every BGE Fast Charger in Maryland – Here’s What I Found

September 15, 2022November 30, 2022 Lanny

Rationale

It’s been over three years since the Maryland Public Service Commission approved an EV charging pilot that allows the utilities to use ratepayer funds to own and operate public charging stations. When they petitioned for approval of the pilot, my utility, BGE, had assured regulators that their public EV charging stations would be highly reliable and that they would respond quickly to resolve outages and issues. How are they doing in that regard? I wanted quantitative data to find out.

95% to 99% uptime is the range described in the utilities’ semi-annual EV charging reports. That seems quite optimistic compared to what other EV drivers and I have experienced. The only way to actually find out the ground truth is to go out and visit the chargers. I chose to evaluate all the utility-owned fast chargers in the BGE service territory.

Professor David Rempel of the University of California, Berkeley recently published a study on the reliability of the public (non-Tesla) electric vehicle fast chargers in the San Francisco Bay Area. The results showed that more than a quarter of the chargers in the Bay Area were not functioning or had a design failure. The non-functioning stations suffered from non-responsive displays, payment system failures, initiation failures, network failures, or damaged connectors.

The Berkeley study utilized a group of volunteer EV drivers who visited the chargers and tested each one by plugging into their EV and attempting to charge for two minutes. The methods used in the Berkeley study inspired the procedure that I used to test the fast chargers in Maryland.

Procedure

Between August 28 and September 6, 2022, I tested all 69 public fast chargers that are owned and operated by BGE. I created a map of the charger locations and divided the locations into manageable groups that I could visit and evaluate over a number of days.

I drove to each site and worked through a checklist of tasks to test each fast charger. First I took a series of photos of the chargers. Then I recorded the Station ID, model and serial number of each unit. I visually inspected the equipment including the display, cables and connectors for damage. I documented the online status of the charger in the Shell Recharge mobile app. Then I attempted to initiate a charge via the app. If the unit began charging, I let it run for two minutes. Meanwhile I took note of the charging speed and made sure that the charger was operating as expected. After two minutes, I’d stop the charge and then attempt to initiate a charge using the RFID card reader.

If a charging session failed, I reported it to Shell Recharge customer service. This should have alerted BGE of the specific chargers that were having issues. In many instances, when I reported the issue, Shell Recharge responded that a service ticket had previously been created.

Results

A charger was classified as fully functional if it authorized via the Shell Recharge app (or started free), initiated a charge, and maintained the expected charging speed for two minutes.

71% (49) of the BGE fast chargers were fully functional as defined above.

14.5% (10) of the chargers were completely inoperable.

2.9% (2) consistently displayed error codes and would not charge.

4.4% (3) were offline and did not respond via the app. However, these did initiate via a tap of a Shell Recharge RFID card. Most drivers however do not carry a Shell Recharge card.

7.2% (5) initiated a charge but delivered very low power, around 15 kW. That is a fraction of the 50 kW rated power for those stations.

ChargerAudit – Crowdsourcing EV Charger Reliability Data

August 23, 2022November 30, 2022 Lanny

An experiment, born today on social media.

EV drivers on Twitter are frustrated by broken chargers and the lack of transparency around charger uptime metrics.

Version 0.1 of the Citizen #ChargerAudit Project is very simple.

The Price is Right?

August 15, 2022August 15, 2022 Lanny

Fairfax County Herrity Building Garage EV Charging — Herrity Garage, Fairfax, VA

“Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.” – Warren Buffett

The price of a gallon of gas never differs much between gasoline retailers in my area. I’ve paid attention to gas prices lately as they have soared above $5.00 and then retreated a bit. Even though I don’t buy the stuff, a gallon of gasoline at the Exxon station on the corner never varies more than a few cents from the price advertised at the convenience store across the street. Public EV charging prices may be more stable in comparison, but they are not particularly uniform. How do EV charging prices get determined? Public documents from Fairfax County, Virginia give us a glimpse into their particular process for price setting.

Public Charging Fees Set by Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

This month, the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors approved a $0.30 per kWh fee for EV charging on county property. They also set an idling fee of $2.00 per hour.

The 30 cents per kilowatt hour is to be paid by members of the public as well as by county employees who charge their private electric vehicles while at work. The “dwell-time” fee of $2.00 per hour kicks in when the vehicle is finished charging after a 10-minute grace period.

The idling fee is to motivate EV drivers to vacate charging spaces at county office buildings when their battery is full. The idling fee is also deliberately intended to apply at Park-and-Ride and Metro garages where EV drivers cannot move their vehicles in the middle of the day. More on that later.

How did Fairfax County come up with these fees? Let’s take a look.

$0.30 per kWh for EV Charging in Fairfax County VA

A report titled “Establishment of Retail Fees for the Charging of Electric Vehicles at County-Owned Charging Stations” was prepared by county staff for the Board of Supervisors. It detailed the rationale for the $0.30 per kilowatt hour pricing and $2.00 per hour dwell-time fee.

The report said that the most important considerations in setting the fees were (1) the costs that are to be recovered by the fees; (2) the user’s ability to access and move their vehicle when charging is completed, and (3) competitiveness with the fees charged by other stations located nearby.

The methodology used to determine the pricing weighed the relative merits of a cost recovery method vs a competitive market approach. The report concluded that while cost recovery was an important consideration, pricing that remained in line with the competitive market took precedence. “Prices that are too high in comparison to those charged by other providers are likely to lead to reduced demand for the service absent some unique benefit.”

Level 2 Prices Conflated with DC Fast Charging

Fairfax County surveyed fees by various EV charging providers in the county but they did not distinguish between Level 2 and DC fast charger pricing. The fees that they compared are summarized in Table 1 of the report:

Clarksburg Condominium II Electric Vehicle Charging Stations

July 29, 2022July 29, 2022 Lanny

Access to reliable and affordable charging where people live is essential to the widespread adoption of electric vehicles.

Robert Borkowski is fortunate to have a garage at his home at Clarksburg Condominium II in order to charge his Tesla. But many of his neighbors in Montgomery County, Maryland do not have a private garage or parking space to install a personal EV charging station. As President of his condo association, Robert decided to look into installing shared charging stations for residents of his condo community who do not have a garage or dedicated parking.

Clarksburg Condominium II Community Buy-in

Getting approval for the project required a “yes” vote from two-thirds of the condo residents. The association sent out a survey to gauge interest among residents for EV charging. Supporters of the project held several community meetings to answer questions and address concerns. They set up a Frequently Asked Questions page on the association’s website about the proposed EV charging stations.

Maryland EVSE Incentives

Taking advantage of available EV charger incentives helped the association manage out of pocket expenses. Keeping the cost down helped persuade some residents who initially opposed the project because of budget concerns. The Maryland Energy Administration (MEA) offers a 40% rebate for qualifying EVSE installations. The condo association also applied for incentives from their utility company. Potomac Edison offers up to $20,000 through their EV Driven Multifamily program. In total, the project cost around $60,000. Incentives from the state of Maryland and Potomac Edison amounted to around $44,000. The net cost to the association was around $16,000 after incentives.

The association had to pay the entire costs for the construction up front before receiving the rebates. The Montgomery County Green Bank worked with City First Enterprise’s Small Business Energy Savings Support Program on a $60,000 loan to help facilitate the electric vehicle charging project.

The condo association selected six JuiceBox PRO commercial grade EVSEs from EnelX for the project. These units are connected to a network with accompanying monthly service fees. This allows residents and visitors to pay for their kWh usage via a mobile app. The initial cost for residents is $0.20 per kWh. Visitors can charge for $0.30 per kWh.

The six 40A JuiceBox PRO commercial EVSE (Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment) are on a new dedicated 400A 3-Phase commercial service. The infrastructure includes capacity to install 11 additional EVSEs in the future.

Clarksburg Condominium DFH — Delegate David Fraser-Hidalgo highlights the progress of EVs in Maryland as Clarksburg Condominium II President Robert Borkowski looks on.

Ribbon Cutting Ceremony

US Transportation Secretary Says NEVI Program Will Prioritize EV Charging Experience

July 21, 2022November 30, 2022 Lanny

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg testified before Congress on July 19, 2022 about transportation infrastructure.

During the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure hearing, Rep. Carolyn Bourdeaux of Georgia’s 7th district asked Secretary Buttigieg about the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program and how the Administration has prioritized the charging experience for consumers “to ensure it’s easy, consistent, and mirrors their current experience at the pump.”

Buttigieg responded, “There’s tons of opportunity but a lot of challenge in getting it right for this electric vehicle infrastructure especially because we’ve not had something like this at scale in the US. It’s very different from the infrastructure for fuel and gas cars. We need to be mindful of that as we go.”

You can imagine, if you are taking a road trip and every third or fourth gas pump didn’t work.
Pete Buttigieg

One thing we are thinking about in particular in regard to the consumer experience is making sure that these charging stations are interoperable and are available. You can imagine, if you are taking a road trip and every third or fourth gas pump didn’t work, or if you had to be a member of a particular gas station chain in order to even use the pump. That would not be a positive or efficient experience. In some places, in some cases in the past, that’s what some EV drivers have faced. So we need to make sure that we are not only getting the dots in the right places on the maps, but paying attention to the quality as well as the quantity of these EV charging stations, especially those that would be supported with taxpayer funds.

Thank you Representative Bourdeaux for asking about the consumers’ experience at EV charging stations. And thank you Secretary Buttigieg for assuring Congress that the Joint Office is mindful of the quality of the EV charging stations that will be installed as part of the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Program. Reliability of public charging is an important issue. I look forward to seeing how the Administration will ensure accountability.

EV Charger Reliability Standards Report Issued by Maryland PSC Work Group

July 20, 2022November 30, 2022 Lanny

“Consistently delivering on your promise reinforces trust.” ― Bernard Kelvin Clive

Will people develop trust that electricity can replace gasoline as “fuel” for their transportation? This must happen before electric vehicles enter mainstream adoption. Sure, we are told by advocates that 90% of charging is done at home. But we also know that ubiquitous public charging is important to ensure equity so that all citizens may benefit from driving electric. After all, many people do not have access to charging at home or work. For those folks, DC fast chargers are practically their only option. And those chargers better deliver on the promise of convenience, reliability and affordability. Otherwise, people won’t trust the chargers. Consequently, they won’t trust electric cars.

On January 14, 2019, the Maryland Public Service Commission approved a five-year pilot program to allow utilities to install public EV charging stations in their service territory. The utilities promised to maintain a high standard of uptime. BGE was quoted in the Carroll County Times saying, “BGE is being held to the same reliability standards as our electric distribution system, so they must be operational at all times.”

Some EV drivers have raised concerns that the utilities’ public EV chargers are not as reliable as we’d hoped they’d be. The Maryland Public Service Commissioners heard that a charger at Howard County Community College had been down for weeks while the one next to it only delivered a fraction of its promised charging speed.

EV Charger Reliability Standards

In January 2022, the Commission directed the utilities to work with a stakeholder work group to develop public charger reliability standards. The standards, if approved, would be used in the semi-annual progress reports that utilities are required to submit. The standards were to be filed prior to the next semi-annual reports which are due August 1, 2022.

Work Group Asks to Delay Uptime Reporting Until Next Year

Maryland EV Registrations Surpass 50,000 as of June 30, 2022

July 19, 2022October 1, 2022 Lanny

Maryland EV Registrations June 30, 2022 — Plug-in electric vehicles registered in Maryland as of June 30, 2022

There are 50,124 plug-in electric vehicles registered in Maryland as of June 30, 2022. That is a 15,283 increase in the number of Maryland EV registrations over the previous 12 month period according to data from MDOT / Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration.

The 12 month increase in Maryland EV registrations amounts to a 44% rise. This compares to a 35% rise over the previous 12 month period between June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2021.

EVgo Blames AT&T for Outage Sunday Evening

July 18, 2022November 30, 2022 Lanny

Charging Sites Completely Down for Hours

EVgo experienced a widespread network outage Sunday evening as many EV drivers were returning from their weekend travels.

Around 6:30 PM July 17th, I noticed an unusual number of chargers on the EVgo network were reporting as offline and unavailable on the EVgo mobile app. At least 16 sites in Virginia were completely down. See the map above for the locations in Virginia that reported no working chargers.

Around 8:00 PM an electric vehicle driver tweeted that the last six EVgo chargers he tried did not work.

AT&T is experiencing communications issues that is impacting our network, please refer to the EVgo app for current charger status and Plugshare for alternative charging options.
evgo

Virginia Anti-ICEing Law – Map of Enforceable Locations

July 1, 2022December 26, 2022 Lanny

Virginia anti-ICEing sign Penalty up to $25 — Enforceable sign at Electrify America, Tysons Corner Center

$25 fine for violation
Takes effect July 1, 2022
EV charging space must be clearly marked
No violation unless the sign includes: “PENALTY, UP TO $25”
Plug-in vehicle “that is not in the process of charging” violates the law

Virginia lawmakers passed a bill earlier this year that creates a prohibition and a civil penalty for certain vehicles parked in spaces reserved for charging electric vehicles. The law goes into effect today.

To be enforced, the Virginia “anti-ICEing” law requires that the parking space adjacent to an electric vehicle charging station be clearly marked as reserved for charging electric vehicles. Additionally, the sign indicating that the space is reserved for charging electric vehicles must include the following language: “PENALTY, UP TO $25.”

The highly-specific signage requirements detailed in many state and local anti-ICEing laws are often not understood by EV drivers. The police will not be able to enforce these laws, including in Virginia, if the charging space is not designated by signs that meet the criteria in the law. In other words, if there are no signs, there can be no fines.

I’ve learned from years of experience advocating for EV drivers that it is relatively easy to pass an anti-ICEing law. It’s a much greater challenge to convince EV charging operators and site hosts to post the special signs that allow the laws to be enforced.

Eight years ago, I approached my local County Council representative to propose an anti-ICEing ordinance. The Howard County, Maryland Council Bill 36-2014 subsequently passed and went into effect on September 29, 2014. That was the easy part.

The main reason I wanted the ordinance was because publicly-funded EV charging stations on property owned by the Columbia Association were chronically being blocked by gas vehicles. When I contacted Columbia Association, they said that they would not do anything about the problem unless there was a law against it.

After the Howard County ordinance passed, I approached the Columbia Association again to ask that they post enforceable signs. To make a long story short, it took another two years and a lot of effort to finally convince them to post enforceable signs. [Signs Posted at Columbia Association EV Charging Stations]

Colorado EV drivers worked to get a statewide anti-ICEing law passed in 2019. When Colorado HB 1298 passed, Tesla indicated their support for the legislation via the following Tweet.